FOUR ALL WHO REED AND RIGHT

FOUR ALL WHO REED AND RIGHT


We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes;
but the plural of ox became oxen not oxes.

One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,
yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice;
yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men,
why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?

If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet,
and I give you a boot, would a pair be called beeth?

If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?

Then one may be that,
and three would be those,
yet hat in the plural would never be hose,
and the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
but though we say mother, we never say methren.

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
but imagine the feminine, she, shis and shim.

[forwarded by Sally Humes]

Mikey’s Thot for the Day:

The face is familiar but I can’t quite remember my name...

PASS IT ON! Yeah, you can send this Funny to anybody you want. And, if you’re REAL nice, you’ll tell them you got it from www.MikeysFunnies.com {No longer active.}

*******************************

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

Who is really behind all this Political Correctness ideology? Has anyone investigated this historically? Granted that the first effort at PC was to protect the African American from slander. Now it has been extended to about everyone and everything else except Christians and the Christian Faith.

Consider for a moment what has happened over the last 50 or so years. Billions upon billions of American dollars have been paid to Middle Eastern countries for their oil. For all these billions of dollars, are the counties that received this money that much better? Certainly in Iraq, the money did not get near the common man. Instead it went to build mansions and bunkers for the leaders.

But that still could not account for all the money. This is strictly my opinion because I have yet to see this put forth anywhere. What if these countries with all their "excess" money and with a world domination mindset decided that the best way to overcome a more powerful country or countries would be to control the way the citizens got their information about world situations? How does 98 percent of the population get their news? The answer is the Main Stream Media, or MSM.

So here is the strategy, take the billions of oil dollars and buy stock in all the major news organizations of the major nations. The stockholders call the shots in any organization or the president and his staff do not have a job! With Muslim nations holding the majority of the stock, guess who calls the shots regarding Islam in the MSM?

Now, in light of what I have put forth above read the following article and comments and ask yourself why the MSM will not speak out against 10,000 protesters outside the White House shouting "Rah, rah, Hezbollah! Long live Hezbollah!”

Home grown terrorists
By Douglas MacKinnon
Friday, August 25, 2006

“We are not at war with the Muslim faith.” So say various members of the media and government, either because they actually believe it, or because their blind adherence to political correctness dictates as much.

............................
During the “war” between Israel and Hezbollah, mostly Muslim-Americans and their sympathizers, protested outside of the White House against Israel and the United States. For the most part, the mainstream media ignored the fact that almost 10,000 of these protesters were shouting, “Rah, rah, Hezbollah! Long live Hezbollah!”

Make no mistake, these were your fellow citizens cheering a terrorist organization that has already proudly killed hundreds of Americans. If they would cheer such a despicable group, what else might they do for them or Al Qaida? A logical question that political correctness forbids us to ask.

Read the complete article and then the comments Here